home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: thales.nmia.com!not-for-mail
- From: barefoot@nmia.com (Kristofer D. Dale)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.audio
- Subject: Re: IP aliasing
- Date: 20 Feb 1996 21:02:45 GMT
- Organization: New Mexico Internet Access
- Message-ID: <4gdctl$vlt@thales.nmia.com>
- References: <4farkg$2pc@csusac.ecs.csus.edu> <4g1lsd$bt4@serpens.rhein.de> <4g7lnp$p4q@news.jhu.edu> <4g7qtd$d0@serpens.rhein.de> <4g99va$2b9@news.jhu.edu> <4gc6i2$fm1@serpens.rhein.de>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: plato.nmia.com
- X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950515BETA PL0]
-
- : >>>Nevertheless, it's netmasking that's used in conjunction with SLIP/PPP,
- : >>>not ip aliasing.
- : >>
- : >>Both is used and the original poster explicitely requested ip aliasing.
- :
- : >Still, the most sensible solution to his particular problem is a subnet,
- : >i.e. netmasking.
- :
- : No. A subnet is no solution because a subnet has to be routed. The original
- : poster explicitely requested ip aliasing _so that the provider does not
- : have to route another ip address_.
-
- how about routing this bickering to a pertinent newsgroup? ;^]
-
- barefoot
-